We develop user centred IAs using card sorting and user testing
Download this product sheet in PDF format
Many web sites have an information architecture (IA) based on an ‘organisational’ view of the site’s content that does not reflect how users go about achieving their goals. Having a user-centred structure for a site IA (i.e. the way user goals are chunked into a hierarchy), and having labels that are understood by users, is key to getting users to their goals quickly and providing a good user experience. The best way to develop a usable IA is to involve users in its development.
IA research is ideally done at an early stage of web site development, after the user goals the site is to support have been established but before any work on site design and layout; however, existing sites with a poor IA also benefit from this type of research.
The approach we adopt offers a combination of both quantitative and qualitative research, using quantitative research to understand the closeness of the relationship between user goals, and qualitative research to gain insights into user behaviour and the language used.
We tend to use open rather than closed card sorting (i.e. with open card sorting users choose the labels for categories rather than putting them under predefined headings) as this does not prejudge the language they will use.
IA development is in two parts:
In order to develop the prototype it is necessary to understand how users group tasks i.e. how they ‘chunk’ them and what labels they give to these groups. This research is undertaken by writing all the various user goals that the site is to support onto individual cards and getting potential site users to sort these into groups. This clearly requires the user goals the site is to support be identified in detail, often there are 50-100 or more supported user goals. This may require user research to identify these goals if they are not understood. It also requires a clear site strategy so the user goals to be supported (and not supported) are clear.
During this sorting process, a WUP moderator probes to understand why the tester is sorting the tasks in a particular way, and what labels they would attach to the various groups. An initial top level sort may be followed by sorting each group in turn into sub groups.
This work can be conducted in two ways:
The process adopted in qualitative IA development augments some existing understanding of how users chunk and label their goals. It is a relatively low cost way to gain some additional insight into users’ behaviour and uses a limited number of respondents (e.g. 6). The client is, necessarily, an active participant in the IA development process. The research is conducted as follows:
A more comprehensive approach to IA prototype development involves larger numbers of respondents so that the outputs of a card sorting exercise (as described above) can be subject to cluster analysis to identify the closeness of the relationships of the groups into which respondents sort the goals. The research is conducted as for the qualitative IA prototype development but:
The prototype is tested and refined through a series of research sessions with representative target users – ideally two or three iterations of user research. The research is conducted as follows:
While we are happy to undertake as many iterations of testing of the prototype IA as may be required, we also offer a training service so that clients can undertake some of this research themselves. Typically, we run a single iteration and, during this, train a member of the client’s staff in the required facilitation skills and other techniques so they can undertake any additional research sessions.
The output of the research is an information architecture for the site, which is detailed in a series of reports:
Most of our work is tailored to individual client’s requirements and we quote an inclusive price for each piece of work. However, the following gives an illustration of typical costs:
To demonstrate the power of usability testing and the value of our approach we run FREE ‘taster sessions’ for prospective clients
T: 01249 444 757 e: info@wupltd.co.uk
How we helped develop the information architecture to make the Houses of Parliament web site more effective
Trigger words can be really helpful in increasing the ’scent’ a link gives off
What’s the issue with card sorting? Anyone who has undertaken a card sorting exercise will know that what it often provides is a BGO – ‘blinding glimpse of the obvious’.